|
|
|
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES |
The Budget Regulations Of The 2005 Fiscal Year, Regulations Related To Deontology And The Rights Of Patients
H. Kadircan KESKİNBORA,a
,
b Öztan ÖNCELb
aGöz Hastalıkları Kliniği, Acıbadem Bakırköy Hastanesi,bDeontoloji ve Tıp Tarihi AD, İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, İSTANBUL
Objective: To compare some of the application rules in the budget regulations of the 2005 fiscal year with the statute of medical deontology, statute of the rights of patients and rules of medical ethics.
Material and Methods: The budget regulations of the 2005 fiscal year which published in the official newspaper dated February 9 th, 2005, the Statute of Medical Deontology which published in the official newspaper dated February 19th, 1960, the 1981 Lisbon Declaration, the 1994 Amsterdam Declaration, the 1995 Bali Declaration and the Statute of Rights of Patients which published in the official newspaper dated August 1st, 1998 were evaluated.
Results: The expression of “Definitely, the diagnosis should be written in all the prescriptions”, the item numbered 5.2.2, the 5th, 6 th, 8th, 9th,10th and 13th items of the rules of price application related to the diagnosis, and fixation of the prices in the event of complications have been attracted our attention. These applications violate the statute of Medical Deontology as well as the medical ethic rules.
Conclusion: Firstly, a regulations should not be in contradiction and should not violate the previous statutes and agreements which are already hiearchically upper than regulations. These applications may urge the medical reasons to the secondary plan, may guide to prefer the cheapness to the quality and may coerse to some incorrect attitudes in the event of complicationsKeywords: Medical ethics, patient rights, official regulationsTurkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics 2007, 15:7-11
|
|
|
|
|
